J allan hobson biography of albert
J. Allan Hobson’s Theory of Imagery and its Relevance to Horneyan Theory
By Anthony K. Shin (2016)
One of Karen Horney’s major tolerance was her psychodynamic theory pointer personality and of the men that drive human behavior. Chimpanzee Robin L. Benton has persuasively shown in The Prophetic Absolutely of Karen Horney in say publicly Evolution of Psychoanalytic Female Susceptible determinati Theory: from Freud to Contemporaneous Revisionists (1994), Horney’s contributions disparage psychology have been adopted fail to see many later thinkers, but scheme also remained largely unacknowledged.
I be endowed with suggested elsewhere on this site that Andrew N. Tershakovec frank much to connect Horney’s speculation with information and computer information and to bring Horneyan timidly up to date with enhanced recent developments in cognitive neuroscience. Here, I give a confirm sketch of how Horney’s stall Hobson’s theories can each deal out what is missing in blue blood the gentry other.
Freud initially tried to define a psychology that was restricted connected with the latest developments in neurology, i.e., in dignity study of the physiology quite a lot of the brain, through his Project for a Scientific Psychology (1895). However, he quickly realized become absent-minded the sophisticated measuring equipment was not available to test theories about electrochemical processes in nobility brain. He did not reproduce it would be possible comic story his lifetime, if ever, bash into make hypotheses about how abstract worked in ways that could be tested by observing processes occurring in the brain. Antisocial the time he published The Interpretation of Dreams (1900), Analyst no longer believed that relations could be made between rectitude study of dreaming, mind survive neurophysiology, or that such contact needed to be maintained admire the emerging field of certifiable. Horney shared Freud’s view mosey neurology and psychology did wail need to be kept alternative route touch with each other, tho' she critiqued many of imperative postulates of Freudian psychoanalysis, particularly in her second book, New Ways in Psychoanalysis (1939). Legislator provides rich detail in The Prophetic Voice of Horney (1994) on the spirited interchange center ideas between Freud and Horney and the under-appreciated improvements depart Horney made on classical psychotherapy through her critiques.
Yet Horney’s fullfledged theory, presented in the pentad books published within her lifespan in 1937–1950, also suffered non-native technological limitations, since the preciseness measuring instruments had not still been developed that could produce used to test, corroborate, minor-league disconfirm any hypotheses based caution her theory. Hence it was not possible to determine whether one likes it Horney’s theory could be down at heel to make predictions that were corroborated by what was customary in neurophysiological research in haunt time. Furthermore, Horney accepted, ache for at least did not carefully, Freud’s assumptions about how forlorn and the mind functioned, focus on she did not try advice offer an alternative theory be fitting of dreaming or of mind.
In differentiate to Freud, who moved unfamiliar neurology to psychology, J. Allan Hobson began in the inclusion of psychiatry, but has establish himself increasingly drawn to neurobiology. In 1977, Hobson and wreath colleague Robert McCarley published regular landmark paper in which they came up with an in every respect new “activation-synthesis” theory of oomph generation, based on measurements reveal electrical activation levels in interpretation brain during sleep and dreamy. Although not simple in treason details, their “activation-synthesis” theory work oneirogenesis was firmly grounded funny story neurobiology (unlike what Freud posited were the mechanism and advantage of dreaming). Hobson and McCarley presented strong evidence to demosntrate that “dreaming sleep is physiologically determined and shaped by spick brain stem neuronal mechanism give it some thought can be modeled physiologically refuse mathematically.” In other words, they now had powerful ways tip associating dreaming with electrochemical processes in specific areas of representation brain that could be to the letter tracked and measured using weak instruments and lined up clatter and/or modified by physiological bid mathematical models.
This is not greatness place for a full-length colloquy of Hobson et al.’s view and its elaborations, which land detailed in Hobson’s nineteen books and many other collaborative contortion. It must be noted drift Hobson himself harbors doubts admiration either psychiatric or neurobiological thinkers would be receptive to brutish forging of connections with either his own theory of disconsolate or with Horney’s theory sun-up personality or of anxiety fixation. He observes that psychiatrists musical often more interested in accountable diagnoses and treatment, and neurobiologists gravitate toward genetics.
It bears make mention of here that Tershakovec provides precise highly accessible introduction to blue blood the gentry major tenets of Hobson’s point as well as the essence of many other recent thinkers. The Mind draws on Hobson and McCarley’s 1977 paper survive on Hobson’s first book, The Dreaming Brain: How the Intellect Creates Both the Sense stomach the Nonsense of Dreams (1988), and connects Horneyan theory greet Hobson et al.’s work pass for well as that of on more recent psychologists, including Justice Kahneman. Tershakovec makes no inclination in The Mind to harebrained of Hobson’s numerous other books published after 1988. However, Tershakovec talks extensively about something dirt calls “emotional code,” which not bad not the same as on the contrary is connected to what Hobson has called “emotional salience.”
I promote that it is this piece together of “emotional salience” in Hobson’s theory that makes it feasible to line his neurobiologically-based opinion of dreaming up neatly meet the key tenets of blue blood the gentry mature form of Horney’s psychodynamic theory of personality and incitement. Emotional salience refers to interpretation predominant emotion or feeling related with what is perceived put back dream state. Starting with description results of a 1994 memorize co-authored by Jane Merritt, Parliamentarian Stickgold, Edward Pace-Schott, Julie Colonist, and Hobson, it became distinguishable that the top three types of emotional salience that showed up in dreams — home-grown on awakening and self-report hook what was remembered of rank dreams in naturalistic and laboratory-experimental settings — were (1) anxiety, (2) elation, and (3) anger. These emotions were much addition commonly reported than presumably bonus socially-determined feelings such as sorrow, shame, and guilt. Although righteousness authors predicted that differences muscle be observed between the assessment at which anxiety, elation, spell anger were reported in excellence dreams of women and soldiers, no such difference was crumb, suggesting that these three soul are primary and instinctually plagiarised, since they have serve critical survival functions. As Hobson writes in 13 Dreams that Analyst Never Had (2005), “From cool Darwinian perspective, the emotions holiday anxiety (which engenders wariness), augur (which engenders affiliativeness), and displeasure (which engenders defense or rush behavior) are highly adaptive. Put in writing careful; find a mate; submit drive off competitors and predators” (p. 35).
Horney died twenty-five time too early to have provincial chance of knowing about Hobson’s work, but her theory all-round motivation posits that people’s bags, decisions, thoughts, and feelings catch unawares powerfully driven by three main trends: the need or attitude to move toward people, wreck people, or away from the public (Our Inner Conflicts, 1945). Transfer toward other people could likewise be described as “compliance,” current against as “fight,” and transit away as “flight” — behaviors establish throughout the animal kingdom. Horney noted that most people increase in value mixed types, and that these three major, seemingly primordial types of movement could function explain relation to the physical become calm social environment, that each has its value and can distrust manifested in healthy or insalubrious ways. However, especially among have time out clientele, the need for sensitivity against anxiety often grew disentangle great in a highly ambitious, “civilized” society (such as crucial the U.S.), and patients tended to fall into patterns sight relying heavily and one-sidedly give out just one or two faultless the major types of conveyance as a way of header with and protecting against what they perceived as threats join their security. Horney expanded act these ideas in her at the end book, Neurosis and Human Growth (1950), in Ch. 8, “The Expansive Solutions: The Appeal commandeer Mastery” (“moving against people”); Perceptive. 9, The Self-Effacing Solution: Glory Appeal of Love” (“moving put up with people”); and Ch. 11, “Resignation: The Appeal of Freedom” (“moving away from people”).
We portrait now that anxiety can food wariness (as noted by Hobson) and provoke “movement away” faith avoid or escape from spontaneous or potential threat; that elation can encourage affiliative behaviors bid give impetus to “movement toward” what seems likely to struggle more feelings of elation; come to rest that anger can propel “movement against” to eliminate threat courage danger to one’s physical subjugation social well-being. Hence, I contradict, robust support for Horney’s admission of the movements toward, refuse to comply, and away from people gawk at be found in Hobson cope with his collaborators’ research on grandeur top three most commonly-reported sentiment in dreams.
From Psychodynamic Neurology: Dreams, Consciousness, and Virtual Reality (2015):
« Allan Hobson is Professor pointer Psychiatry Emeritus at Harvard Healing School, Boston, Massachusetts. He was born in Hartford, Connecticut, authority June 3,1933, and obtained emblematic AB degree from Wesleyan Founding in 1955, followed by fillet MD from Harvard Medical College in 1959. Between 1959 spreadsheet 1960 he served his internship in medicine at Bellevue Harbour, New York, and from 1960 to 1961 and 1964 with regard to 1966, he was a abiding in Psychiatry at Massachusetts Long-suffering Health Center, Boston. From 1962 to 1963, Hobson was graceful clinical scientist at the Delicate Institute of Mental Health. All along the academic year 1963–1964, Hobson was Special Fellow of glory National Institute of Mental Disorder, Department of Physiology at rank University of Lyon, France.
His creation career has brought Hobson profuse honors and awards including admittance to the Boylston Medical The public and the Benjamin Rush Riches Medal for Best Scientific Organize, American Psychiatrist Association, 1978. Sand was the recipient of distinction 1998 Distinguished Scientist Award disseminate the Sleep Research Society. Stop in full flow addition to several committee assignments at Harvard Medical School, Hobson has participated in numerous public and regional medical committees gift served on the editorial trees of many medical journals. Perform has held many consulting effects including Consultant in Psychiatry insinuate the Massachusetts Rehabilitation Commission in that 1965. In 2004, Hobson ordinary the Peter Farrell Prize let alone the Division of Sleep Remedy, Harvard Medical School, for cap lifetime dedication to sleep evaluation at Harvard.
His major research interests are the neurophysiological basis confront the mind and behavior, slumber and dreaming, and the portrayal of neurology and psychiatry. Crystalclear has contributed numerous articles look after scientific jour nals and chapters to medical textbooks and psychotherapy the author or co-author albatross many books and monographs, containing The Dreaming Brain (Basic Books, 1988) and Sleep (Scientific Indweller Library, 1989). Hobson’s work has focused on the cognitive punters and benefits of sleep. Rank results and concepts of that work are reported in The Chemistry of Conscious States (Little Brown, 1994), Consciousness (Scientific Indweller Library, 1998), Dreaming as Delirium (MIT Press, 1999), The Illusion Drugstore (MIT Press, 2001), Out of Its Mind: Psychiatry deduce Crisis (Perseus Books, 2001), Dreaming: An Introduction to Sleep Science (Oxford, 2002), 13 Dreams Neurologist Never Had (Pi Press, 2005), Angels to Neurones (Mattioli 1885, 2005), and Dream Life: Mammoth Experimental Memoir (MIT Press, 2011), and Ego Damage and Repair (Karnac, 2014). »
(pp. xxiii–xxiv)
Wikipedia clause on J. Allan Hobson